http://razorshine.disqus.com/Looking at new internet and mobile technologies and services and examining their ramifications online within the consumer and marketing spaces.enFri, 28 Mar 2008 04:08:28 -0000http://www.razorshine.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/#comment-1276471the short answer is not right now - I&#039;ll give a more detailed answer in the next few posts!Riaz KananiFri, 28 Mar 2008 04:08:28 -0000http://www.razorshine.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/#comment-1276470Please tell us more about what life stream aggregators do vs. standard social networking like Facebook? Should I join one these services?Dylan FullerThu, 20 Mar 2008 08:39:55 -0000http://www.razorshine.com/archive/2008/03/17/friendfeed-or-social-thing-or-are-lifestreams-a-waste-of-time/#comment-1276469Think I am contradicting myself in this post somewhat - I prefer the ability to message back into the orginal service, and yet I am saying that users would not have to sign up for the various services. <br></br><br> Does that mean friendfeed is better for mainstream users? </br><br></br><br> I think I end up with the life stream aggregator being integrates at the OS or browser level (ie not a website) and all these services being able to be signed into using openID (which would allow the commenting. </br>Riaz KananiTue, 18 Mar 2008 08:26:32 -0000